Stolen Valor Act Of 2013 - Stolen Valor Act

Stolen Valor Act of 2013  - stolen valor act

The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 (Pub.L. 113â€"12; H.R. 258) is a United States federal law that was passed by the 113th United States Congress. The law amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a person to fraudulently claim having received any of a series of particular military decorations and awards with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefit from convincing someone that he or she rightfully did receive that award.

This law is a revised version of a previous one that was struck down by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case United States v. Alvarez for being an infringement of the constitutional right to freedom of speech.

Stolen Valor Act of 2013  - stolen valor act
Provisions of the bill

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source.

The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 amends the federal criminal code to rewrite provisions relating to fraudulent claims about military service to subject to a fine, imprisonment for not more than one year, or both for an individual who, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds himself or herself out to be a recipient of:

  • a Medal of Honor (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard)
  • a Distinguished Service Cross,
  • a Navy Cross,
  • an Air Force Cross,
  • a Silver Star,
  • a Purple Heart,
  • a Combat Infantryman's Badge,
  • a Combat Action Badge,
  • a Combat Medical Badge,
  • a Combat Action Ribbon,
  • a Combat Action Medal, or
  • any replacement or duplicate medal for such medal as authorized by law.


Congressional Budget Office report

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Budget Office, a public domain source.

H.R. 258 makes changes to the current federal offenses relating to fraudulent claims about military service. As a result, the government might be able to pursue cases that it otherwise would not be able to prosecute. CBO expects that H.R. 258 would apply to a relatively small number of additional offenders, however, so any increase in costs for law enforcement, court proceedings, or prison operations would not be significant. Any such costs would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

Because those prosecuted and convicted under H.R. 258 could be subject to civil and criminal fines, the federal government might collect additional fines if the legislation is enacted. Civil and criminal fines are recorded as revenues. Criminal fines are deposited in the Crime Victims Fund and later spent. CBO expects that any additional revenues and direct spending would not be significant because relatively few cases would likely be affected.

Stolen Valor Act of 2013  - stolen valor act
Procedural history

House

The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 H.R. 258 was introduced by Rep. Joe Heck (R-NV) on January 15, 2013. It was referred to the United States House Committee on the Judiciary and the United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Investigations. On May 20, 2013, the House voted to pass the Stolen Valor Act of 2013 by 390-3 in Roll Call Vote 161.

Senate

The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 was received in the United States Senate on May 21, 2013. It passed the Senate by Unanimous consent on May 22, 2013.

Presidential signature

The bill was signed into law by President Barack Obama on June 3, 2013.

0 komentar: